Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 120 Suppl 1: S57-S68, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1972177

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreaks associated with mass religious gatherings which have the potential of invoking epidemics at large scale have been a great concern. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of outbreak in mass religious gathering and further to assess the preparedness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for preventing COVID-19 outbreak in this context. METHODS: The risk of COVID-19 outbreak in mass religious gathering was evaluated by using secondary COVID-19 cases and reproductive numbers. The preparedness of a series of NPIs for preventing COVID-19 outbreak in mass religious gathering was then assessed by using a density-dependent model. This approach was first illustrated by the Mazu Pilgrimage in Taiwan and validated by using the COVID-19 outbreak in the Shincheonji Church of Jesus (SCJ) religious gathering in South Korea. RESULTS: Through the strict implementation of 80% NPIs in the Mazu Pilgrimage, the number of secondary cases can be substantially reduced from 1508 (95% CI: 900-2176) to 294 (95% CI: 169-420) with the reproductive number (R) significantly below one (0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.78), indicating an effective containment of outbreak. The expected number of secondary COVID-19 cases in the SCJ gathering was estimated as 232 (basic reproductive number (R0) = 6.02) and 579 (R0 = 2.50) for the first and second outbreak, respectively, with a total expected cases (833) close to the observed data on high infection of COVID-19 cases (887, R0 = 3.00). CONCLUSION: We provided the evidence on the preparedness of NPIs for preventing COVID-19 outbreak in the context of mass religious gathering by using a density-dependent model.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Crowding , Disease Outbreaks , COVID-19/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Humans , Religion , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Taiwan/epidemiology
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 11380, 2022 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1921722

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic significantly declined cancer screening rates worldwide. Its impact on the South Korean population is unclear, depending on socioeconomic status (SES), residence, and history of chronic disease. This study utilized data (2018-2020) from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, an annual cross-sectional study employing nationally representative random sampling. Cancer screening rates were defined as the proportion of the eligible population who received respective cancer screening within the last 1 year and investigated four major cancers (stomach, colorectal, breast, and cervical). Screening rates every year were compared with screening rate ratios (SRRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Between 2019 and 2020, screening rates declined significantly by 23%, 17%, 12%, and 8% for colorectal cancer (SRR 0.77; 95% CI 0.73-0.82), stomach cancer (SRR 0.83; 95% CI 0.79-0.87), breast cancer (SRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.82-0.93), and cervical cancer (SRR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97), respectively. Regardless of cancer type, screening was significantly lower in metropolitan residents, those with higher SES, and, interestingly, those without a history of chronic diseases. The significant decline in cancer screening during the pandemic requires urgent political intervention to reduce the burden of future cancer incidence and mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control
3.
Transl Lung Cancer Res ; 10(12): 4403-4413, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1579494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the fear of COVID-19 and how much it affected the behaviors of the general population towards cancer screening. METHODS: The Korean National Cancer Screening Survey is an annual population-based, cross-sectional survey to investigate cancer screening rates of five major malignancies. We extracted data on 3,557 cancer-free respondents aged ≥40 years in 2020, including sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, family history of cancer, self-perceived general health status, attitudes towards screening, and fear of COVID-19 compared with lung cancer. We collected information on health check-ups participation including cancer screening with or without schedule during the pandemic and analyzed the participation rate according to the degree of fear of COVID-19. RESULTS: Among 3,557 respondents, 1,066 (29.97%) people were more worried by COVID-19 than by lung cancer. 2,392 (67.25%) did not participate in health check-ups, of which 573 (24.0%) had a schedule for health check-ups but did not receive. We observed a significant increase (P<0.05) in the proportion of non-participation with schedule when the fear of COVID-19 exceeds lung cancer. In multivariate logistic analysis, the respondents with more fear of COVID-19 compared with lung cancer showed decreased likelihood of attendance in health check-ups (OR, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of the general population perceived more fear of COVID-19 than lung cancer, which significantly hampered their engagement in regular medical check-ups including cancer screening. This finding highlights the need for providing appropriate information to the target population of lung cancer screening to minimize disruption in cancer prevention activities.

4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(18)2021 09 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1438582

ABSTRACT

We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Korean national five-day residential smoking cessation program and the factors affecting the long-term smoking cessation of participants. The residential smoking cessation program (2017-2018) recruited smokers with a smoking duration ≥ 20 years and who have attempted to quit smoking more than twice and/or smokers with chronic morbidities. Participants underwent an intensive intervention, including individual psychological therapy, group therapy, medical counseling, and pharmacotherapy. The 6-month continuous abstinence rate (CAR) was assessed via self-reports, the urine cotinine levels, and/or expired-air carbon monoxide levels. Logistic regression was used to analyze the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) to assess factors related to smoking cessation. Overall, 484 participants who completed the residential program and questionnaire were evaluated. The 3- and 6-month CAR were 81.82% and 63.22%, respectively. The aOR of 6-month continuous abstinence was lower among participants with severe nicotine dependence (aOR: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.81) and higher among participants with combination therapy of varenicline with short-term nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (aOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.07-2.51), with higher self-efficacy (aOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.15-3.37). The residential smoking cessation program was effective. High self-efficacy, combination therapy of varenicline with short-term NRT, and low nicotine dependence were associated with a high 6-month CAR.


Subject(s)
Smoking Cessation , Tobacco Use Disorder , Humans , Smoking , Tobacco Use Cessation Devices , Varenicline
5.
Cancer Res Treat ; 53(2): 323-329, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1134332

ABSTRACT

At the end of 2019, the cause of pneumonia outbreaks in Wuhan, China, was identified as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. In February 2020, the World Health Organization named the disease cause by SARS-CoV-2 as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In response to the pandemic, the Korean Cancer Association formed the COVID-19 task force to develop practice guidelines. This special article introduces the clinical practice guidelines for cancer patients which will help oncologists best manage cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Clinical Trials as Topic , Early Detection of Cancer , Humans , Patient Safety , Republic of Korea
6.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(6): e19455, 2020 06 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-459467

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In case of a population-wide infectious disease outbreak, such as the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), people's online activities could significantly affect public concerns and health behaviors due to difficulty in accessing credible information from reliable sources, which in turn causes people to seek necessary information on the web. Therefore, measuring and analyzing online health communication and public sentiment is essential for establishing effective and efficient disease control policies, especially in the early stage of an outbreak. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the trends of online health communication, analyze the focus of people's anxiety in the early stages of COVID-19, and evaluate the appropriateness of online information. METHODS: We collected 13,148 questions and 29,040 answers related to COVID-19 from Naver, the most popular Korean web portal (January 20, 2020, to March 2, 2020). Three main methods were used in this study: (1) the structural topic model was used to examine the topics in the online questions; (2) word network analysis was conducted to analyze the focus of people's anxiety and worry in the questions; and (3) two medical doctors assessed the appropriateness of the answers to the questions, which were primarily related to people's anxiety. RESULTS: A total of 50 topics and 6 cohesive topic communities were identified from the questions. Among them, topic community 4 (suspecting COVID-19 infection after developing a particular symptom) accounted for the largest portion of the questions. As the number of confirmed patients increased, the proportion of topics belonging to topic community 4 also increased. Additionally, the prolonged situation led to a slight increase in the proportion of topics related to job issues. People's anxieties and worries were closely related with physical symptoms and self-protection methods. Although relatively appropriate to suspect physical symptoms, a high proportion of answers related to self-protection methods were assessed as misinformation or advertisements. CONCLUSIONS: Search activity for online information regarding the COVID-19 outbreak has been active. Many of the online questions were related to people's anxieties and worries. A considerable portion of corresponding answers had false information or were advertisements. The study results could contribute reference information to various countries that need to monitor public anxiety and provide appropriate information in the early stage of an infectious disease outbreak, including COVID-19. Our research also contributes to developing methods for measuring public opinion and sentiment in an epidemic situation based on natural language data on the internet.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Coronavirus Infections , Health Communication , Information Seeking Behavior , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Anxiety Disorders , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Health Information Exchange , Humans , Internet , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Public Opinion , Republic of Korea , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL